San Luis Environment warns of the consequences of keeping wild animals as pets.

Most read

Within the consequences of pet keeping, one is that 9 out of 10 wild animals that are commercialized come directly from nature.

80% of the specimens die during their capture and transportation, which is always carried out in poor conditions.

The Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development asks the community for greater awareness to curb pet keeping. Our province has a very rich biodiversity distribution, which has been exploited by poachers who mainly commercialize songbirds, land turtles, mammals, and other specimens of the native fauna.

The Environmental Police, together with COSAFI and other security forces entities, carry out exhaustive controls at border posts and on provincial routes; therefore, environmental education is key to strengthening the effort for biodiversity made by the provincial government.

Animal rescue work combating pet keeping
Animal rescue work combating pet keeping

Consequences of pet keeping: Natural imbalance

Each wild animal performs functions directly or indirectly related to other species. When a specimen is removed from its habitat, an imbalance is caused that affects other animals and the environment in general. “The plundering of animals from nature is serious because it consists of the constant extraction of their habitats of thousands of birds, mammals, and reptiles that suffer and die during their capture and while they are kept captive while trying to sell them,” explained the biologist from the Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development, Lara Denápole.

If we continue with this behavior, there will come a time when many species in our country and the world will become extinct, affecting the entire life cycle on the planet and, consequently, the human species as well.

What is pet keeping?

It is the ownership of a wild animal as a pet in a private home, outside its natural habitat. Wild animals cannot and should not be pets, as they cannot adapt to the living conditions in our homes. Bringing a wild animal home is a selfish act on the part of humans; for the animal, it does not bring any benefit.

They do not need humans to fulfill any of their natural functions.

Most people who bring a wild animal into their home are unaware of the real needs (physical, physiological, and psychological) of the species, and do not assess the harm they cause to the animal and its species. A “chubby” or well-furred/feathered animal does not mean a healthy animal; animals have socio-environmental needs (stimuli, space, interaction with their peers, etc.) specific to their species, which can never be met by humans.

Consequences of pet keeping

Each enclosed wild animal is one less individual in its wild population and is ecologically useless, as it will not leave descendants or fulfill its functions within the ecosystem. By growing up and living in contact with humans, they <a href="https://noticiasambientales.com/animales/la-fund

Latest news

Pesticides revealed as responsible for biodiversity crisis

Beyond eliminating the target species, pesticides are causing catastrophic effects on hundreds of species of microorganisms, fungi, plants, insects,...

Related news