The European Union has allocated enormous sums to the fishing sector over the past three decades, but a recent report highlights that these investments have not managed to protect the oceans. Despite directing around 31 billion euros consistently, the economic and environmental effectiveness of these policies is in question.
EU subsidies in question: limited impact on the oceans
A study by the environmental organization Bloom reveals that European funds have supported fishing models that harm marine ecosystems. Meanwhile, artisanal fishermen have received only a minimal fraction of the aid.
The report criticizes the lack of transparency of the European Commission in managing these funds. This opacity makes it difficult to accurately assess how resources are actually used and their impact.
It is estimated that more than 50% of European waters are subjected to trawling, a destructive practice that affects even protected areas. This contrasts with a global average of 14%.
The inefficacy of community policies has also been pointed out by the European Court of Auditors, which has repeatedly mentioned that a healthy ecological state and sustainability in fishing exploitation have not been achieved.
Regarding the distribution of funds, Spain is the main recipient of fishing subsidies, despite ranking only third in the number of vessels.
To improve the situation, Bloom proposes reforms such as greater data centralization, elimination of subsidies for fishing overcapacity, and support for ecological regeneration. These measures could create a more sustainable fishing sector beneficial to marine ecosystems.
This situation reignites the debate on how public resources dedicated to fishing should be used, urging a balance between ocean protection and the economic well-being of the sector.
