The new government of Chile decided to withdraw dozens of environmental decrees promoted by the previous administration. The decision was presented to the Comptroller General of the Republic on March 12.
In total, there are 43 regulations that were under review. The measure was adopted in the early days of the administration led by José Antonio Kast.
Additionally, it is part of an internal audit on pending regulations. However, the scope of the decision raised concerns in various sectors.
Ecosystems at risk and regulatory rollback
Among the withdrawn decrees was the creation of key protected areas. One of the most relevant cases is the marine environment of the Juan Fernández Islands.
This region has a high biodiversity and unique ecosystems in the Pacific. Additionally, measures were included to strengthen the protection of the Humboldt penguin.
This species faces threats linked to climate change and human activity. Therefore, the elimination of these regulations could weaken its conservation.
Overall, Chile had managed to protect more than 20% of its territory. This included both terrestrial areas and inland waters.
A shift in environmental policy
The review of decrees is a common practice in government changes. However, the magnitude of the withdrawal sets an unusual precedent.
In this case, the decision involves halting key regulatory tools. Moreover, it occurs in a context where the country seeks to attract investments.
This creates tensions between economic development and sustainability. The debate is also linked to environmental management models in the region.
In particular, similar approaches to those promoted in Argentina are mentioned. Thus, the measure gains relevance beyond the national scope.
Environmental impact of withdrawing these regulations
The elimination of decrees can lead to a loss of effective protection of sensitive ecosystems. Without clear regulations, the risk of environmental degradation increases.
This affects both biodiversity and ecosystem services. Additionally, the lack of protection can facilitate extractive activities in vulnerable areas.
Consequently, the pressure on endangered species increases. It could also deteriorate the water quality and soil in critical areas.
On the other hand, the withdrawal of regulations weakens long-term environmental planning. This hinders adaptation to climate change. It may also affect international commitments in conservation matters.
Reactions and future challenges
The decision raised concerns among scientific sectors and environmental organizations. Various actors warn about the loss of tools built through agreements.
These regulations aimed to strengthen institutions and protect communities. At the same time, there is a need to review how public policies are managed.
The challenge lies in balancing economic growth with environmental protection. In this context, Chile’s ecological reputation is also at stake.
The country had been considered a regional leader in sustainability. Therefore, the path it takes going forward will be key to its international positioning. Thus, the debate remains open, with a focus on the future of ecosystems and the political decisions that will define their conservation.
